Legal Opinion
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 13, 1974No. 44232, 44253PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
The issue raised by this appeal is the constitutionality of Ex. Sess. L. 1971, c. 24, Minn. St. 473F, commonly referred to as the “Metropolitan Fiscal Disparities Act.” The trial court held the statute to be in violation of Minn. Const, art. 9, § 1, and we reverse.
The action was initiated as a declaratory judgment suit by the village of Burnsville, located in Dakota County, against the auditors of Dakota County, Ramsey County, Anoka County, Carver County, Scott County, and Washington County, the finance director and auditor of Hennepin County, and the state treasurer.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. CabelleroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.