Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Barnard

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1935No. Civ. 8886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

On December 28, 1925, as security for eleven several promissory notes payable to respondent Chas. Barnard, each due on December 28, 1930, appellants, as trustors, executed a deed of trust to Ventura County Title Company, as trustee, upon real property therein described, Chas. Barnard being named as beneficiary.

Prior to the maturity of the notes and thereafter, the parties had extensive negotiations for the liquidation thereof, pursuant to which extensions for payment were from time to time granted by respondent. These negotiations were devoid of any results, and nothing was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wehle v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Woods v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Bailey v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Reynolds v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gronenschild v. RitzenthalerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Mealy v. Sunland Refining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API