Legal Opinion

Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. 19 Thames Street Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 12, 2008No. AC 28194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The plaintiff, Tyler E. Lyman, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which determined that the plaintiff is not entitled to a brokerage commission on a 2002 lease entered into between the defendant 19 Thames Street Partnership1 and the defendant’s lessee. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that the current occupant of the defendant’s premises is not necessarily the defendant’s “tenant” and, as a consequence, mistakenly held that there was no renewal of a 1997 lease brokered by the plaintiff. We disagree and affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Town of Southington v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Costa v. CostaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. Legion of Christ Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  2. Doe v. Legion of Christ Inc.et alDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  3. Doe v. Legion of Christ, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  4. Doe v. Legion of Christ, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  5. Doe v. Legion of Christ, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API