Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Hill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1925No. 19170. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— The relator, in his petition for a writ of mandate, avouches that he is a taxpayer of the city of Walla Walla, of which respondents are city commissioners; that one of the duties of the city com missioners is to keep the sidewalks free from obstructions; that on the sidewalks of certain streets the respondents have allowed obstructions to exist, consisting of gasoline pumps owned and operated by private individuals, located in such a manner that they occupy a portion of the space needed by pedestrians; that the existence of these obstructions constitutes a nuisance, and is also in violation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hawes v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Reed v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State ex rel. B. Schade Brewing Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. Camp Lewis Service & Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Mason v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Seattle v. P. B. Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Vandervort v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People Ex Rel. Stonebraker v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API