State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Hill
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
— The relator, in his petition for a writ of mandate, avouches that he is a taxpayer of the city of Walla Walla, of which respondents are city commissioners; that one of the duties of the city com missioners is to keep the sidewalks free from obstructions; that on the sidewalks of certain streets the respondents have allowed obstructions to exist, consisting of gasoline pumps owned and operated by private individuals, located in such a manner that they occupy a portion of the space needed by pedestrians; that the existence of these obstructions constitutes a nuisance, and is also in violation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Hawes v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Reed v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. B. Schade Brewing Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. Camp Lewis Service & Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Mason v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Seattle v. P. B. Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Vandervort v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- People Ex Rel. Stonebraker v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.