Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Phoenix House
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Debra Silber, J.
The decision/order on this motion is as follows:
Defendants Phoenix House and Sydney Hargrove bring this pre-answer motion to dismiss plaintiff Wilson’s action against them. Plaintiff opposes the motion.
For the reasons set forth herein, the defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Defendants aver that pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), dismissal of plaintiffs complaint is warranted as plaintiff fails to state any legally cognizable cause of action. Defendants also move, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3), to dismiss plaintiff Wilson’s claim for…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barker v. Women In Need, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Blevins v. Town of BrightonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
- Jennifer Pauyo v. Citibank, N.A., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and TransUnion LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Newson v. Vivaldi Real Estate LTD.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025