Legal Opinion

Greissing v. Oakland Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Adah V. Greissing against the Oakland Motor Company for breach of a contract for the exchange of automobiles. Judgment for plaintiff. De-fendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff in this case claims that on or about May 19, 1914, she entered into an agreement through the defendant’s agent to purchase a car from the defendant; that the purchase price was fixed at $2,450 and that she was to pay for the car by turning over to the defendant her Oldsmobile Limited at *117a valuation of $1,450, and the difference between these was to be paid in cash; that the contract was executed May 19, 1914; that with the car she was to get new cushion covers; that the car was to be a model 6-60, which was represented to her at the time by the defendant’s agent to be the latest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wells v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mortensen v. BradshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Glassbrook v. Lansing Wheelbarrow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. MassacarMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Parkhouse v. HodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kuehl v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API