Ross v. State

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR.

Distinguished counsel for the defendant has filed an interesting suggestion of error, in which he quotes a part of the opinion rendered heretofore, concluding with the statement of the court:

"We are of the opinion that the appellant cannot invoke the protection of the law against search and seizure without a warrant, when he at the same time testifies that the thing which was unlawfully searched by the officer was not his property nor in his possession," — and then says: "That assumes that appellant is estopped from calling on the protection of the law of search…