Legal Opinion
MVM, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 18, 1999No. 99-137CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*139 OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Judge.
I. Introduction
After a trial on the merits, pursuant to Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (R.C.F.C.) 52(a), the Court concludes that the Plaintiff has established prejudice in connection with the failure of the United States Marshals Service (hereinafter “the agency”) to comply with FAR' 15.206. Accordingly, the Court orders the agency to amend the solicitation and to resolicit bids for this contract.
II. Background Facts
A. Solicitation and Award
Previously, the Court denied motions for summary judgment filed by MVM (the Plaintiff), the United States (the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hospital Klean of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- FirstLine Transportation Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Seaborn Health Care, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Ironclad/EEI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.