Morgan Stanley Group, Inc. v. New England Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
STEIN, District Judge.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded the above-captioned action to this Court for fact-finding regarding the scope of coverage of an insurance policy held by plaintiffs. The Court concludes that the evidence submitted by the parties fails to resolve the ambiguous language of the policy. Accordingly, the Court applies the contractual rule of contra proferentem, to construe the policy in favor of plaintiffs and enters judgment in their favor.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arises out of the efforts of plaintiffs Morgan…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc. v. These Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Morgan Stanley Group v. New England Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Richard M. McCostis Esq. v. Home Insurance Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003