Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bank U. States

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Pet. fe Sum. Case 104. ■Error.to the Fayette Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robektson

To an action by petition and summons,'by the Bank of the United States against Joel Johnson, on a-promissory note for $5,000,- purporting to have been drawn by the said Joel■ to Richard M. Johnson “or order, negotia“ble and payable in the Bank of Washington, District “of Columbia,” and finally endorsed to the plaintiff, the defendant filed a special plea of non est factum, averring that the note was drawn and delivered by him to the said. Bichard,-in the City of Washington, without the words “or order” in it, and that afterwards the said Richard, without his knowledge or consent, but at the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yeager v. MusgraveWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Tranter v. HibbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Terry v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  4. Murray's Admx. v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. United States Glass Co. v. West Virginia Flint Bottle Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API