Legal Opinion
Matheney v. McClain
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1964No. 42926PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.
The appellants, Cecil B. Matheney and Franklin B. Arnold, filed a' bill of complaint in the Chancery Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, seeking’ to enjoin the appellees., John McClain and C. W. Hicks, from conducting an appraisal business, and asking a judgment for damages. The relief sought is based upon the alleged violation of two contracts, one of which was signed by each of the appellees and appellants. They are identical except for names and dates. The contract signed by John M. McClain is dated June 1, 1961, and the one signed by C. W. Hicks is dated June 4, 1962.
Appellees answered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1936
- Tower Underwriters, Inc. v. CulleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Gannaway v. TolerMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
- Bagwell v. H. B. Wellborn & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith Baking Co. v. BehrensNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- UHS-Qualicare, Inc. v. GULF COAST COM. HOSP., INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Thompson MacHinery Commerce v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Snow Lake Shores Property Owners Corp. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.