Legal Opinion

Isabel D. Mendoza v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided February 9, 2012No. 11-2953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On September 29, 2011, Isabel D. Mendoza, who is self-represented, filed a peti tion for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this Court compelling the VA regional office in Manila, Philippines, to either issue an adverse rating decision from which she can appeal or award her dependency and indemnity compensation benefits. A panel was formed on December 14, 2011, to consider Mrs. Mendoza’s petition and, on January 10, 2012, the panel issued an order holding Mrs. Mendoza’s petition in abeyance for 45 days and directing the Secretary to apprise…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Thomas v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Annette B. Briley v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
  2. Annette B. Briley v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API