Legal Opinion

360training.com, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 7, 2013No. 360TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge

On December 8, 2012, 360Training.com, Inc. (“360”), the Plaintiff in this bid protest matter, filed an Application (the “Application”) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) and Rule 54 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for an award of fees and other expenses incurred in the litigation of the underlying matter. 1 Briefing was completed on March 25, 2013, when 360 submitted an amended application and related attachments. For the following reasons, 360’s Application is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The Court will…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ensley, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API