Legal Opinion

Contra Costa County Department of Children & Family Services v. Kim S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 2002No. A097606PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Kim S. is Joann E.’s grandmother, and was Joann’s guardian ad litem when a dependency petition was filed with respect to Joann. A short time after the petition was filed, the juvenile court appointed a guardian ad litem for Kim. On the record before us, it appears that there was no notice and no hearing when the guardian was appointed for Kim, and therefore that Kim’s right to due process was violated. We reverse the jurisdictional and dispositional orders and remand for further proceedings.

Background

The record reflects that from her birth in March 1997, Joann was cared for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. San Francisco Human Services Agency v. Felicia C.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. In Re Enrique G.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. San Joaquin County Human Services Agency v. C.F.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Contra Costa County Children & Family Services Bureau v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API