Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 16, 1984Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Weinstein, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part, with the following memorandum, in which O’Connor, J. P., concurs. While I concur with the majority to the extent that it concedes that the damages awarded by the trial court were patently excessive, I cannot agree that the trial was otherwise without error. In my view, the trial court erroneously took judicial notice of a Civil Court case within its own personal knowledge with the result that certain of its findings as to credibility were impermissibly tainted and a new trial, as to both liability and damages, is warranted. H On or about…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Kane v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Snow v. . PulitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API