Legal Opinion

Goff v. Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 18, 1983No. 21957Published

1DissentNess, Justice

I disagree.

The claimant last worked for appellant in 1960 when, totally disabled due to his breathing difficulties, he was forced to retire. He did not file a claim until January 5,1979, nearly *387twenty years after he retired. Using the statute applicable in 1960 and this Court’s decision in Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., et al., 241 S. C. 116, 127 S. E. (2d) 288 (1962), the Commission found the claimant knew he had a compensable injury in 1960. The circuit court retroactively applied S. C. Code Ann. § 42-15-40 (1976) as amended, and reversed.

First, I would hold § 42-15-40 (1975) is not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. McCrater v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Chapman v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. United States Rubber Co. v. McManusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Bridges v. CHARLESTON HOUSING AUTHORITYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API