Stiefel v. New York Novelty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Mortimer. Stiefel, as receiver of the New York Novelty Company, from a jüdgipent, of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants Sophia Schwab and others, entered in the office of the clerk'of the county of New York on the. 24th day of March, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term dismissing the complaints.
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.„:
The complaints were dismissed at the.trial on the motion of the defendants without any evidence being taken. The two actions-were, by order of the court, consolidated and to be tried as 6ne upon their respective pleadings already made. The amended complaint in the action against Sophia and Isabella Schwab alleged that, on and prior to July 17, 1894, the defendant company was a domestic manufacturing corporation; that on July 25, 1894, in pm .action in the Superior Court, New York, wherein Frank King was-plaintiff and the defendant company was the defendant, plaintiff was, by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bartlett v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Valentine v. . RichardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Dudley v. Congregation of the Third Order of St. FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nealis v. . American Tube Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sherwood v. HolbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- McQueen v. NewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Irving Trust Co. v. ReikesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930