Legal Opinion

Sheridan Oil Co. v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1940No. 28864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

This action was brought by Maud Cunningham, plaintiff in trial court, against the Sheridan Oil Company, a corporation, defendant in trial court, for damages for failure to furnish casinghead gas for domestic use.

The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land upon which defendant holds a mining lease for the exploration, production, and sale of oil and gas. The defendant operated said lease and produced oil therefrom. As a part of the terms and conditions of the lease it is provided “lessors may, if any well or wells on said premises produce sufficient gas, have gas for domestic…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Ahrens Refrigerator Co. v. R. H. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Midstates Oil Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Principle Films, Inc. v. Wichita Mountains Easter Sunrise Service Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Singer v. TatumMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API