Legal Opinion

Mount v. Riechers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs tried this case upon the theory of a stated account. The defendant proceeded upon the theory of reasonable value.

Among the instructions requested by plaintiffs is the following:

“From the pleadings and evidence in this case, your verdict must be for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,500.”

This instruction was refused, and plaintiffs assign such refusal as error, on the ground that “the stated account was admitted.”

The plaintiffs’ evidence is to the effect that, when David Martiny was discharged from their hospital as cured he asked for his bill and was informed by Dr. Hugh S. Mount…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goltra v. PenlandOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Morrell v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Harding v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Franklin v. NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Swift v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Steele's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Schwartz v. Davis Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Harpole v. Paeschke Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API