United States v. Tomicich
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The defendants’ motion for a new trial in this case raises questions concerning the application of Section 502, 18 U.S.C.A. At this stage of the matter, at any rate, no complaint is made of the conduct of the trial except in so far as the trial court failed to adopt the defendants’ point of view with regard to this statute. The first point made is that the vessel was not engaged in foreign commerce at the time of the acts alleged in the indictment. The catch line heading of Section 502 is entitled “Injuring vessels engaged in foreign commerce”. But the language which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- United States v. SagliettoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deutcsh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Bersio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Marchese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- The Pietro CampanellaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
- In Re John R.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.