Legal Opinion

Piediscalzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1989No. 88-03282PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

549 So.2d 255 (1989)

Thomas PIEDISCALZO, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-03282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 29, 1989.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Andrea Steffen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was charged with possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1987). After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, appellant pleaded nolo…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Meeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. McLeod v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. DeShongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Winters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Brandin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Harford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API