Legal Opinion

Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

924 S.W.2d 632 (1996)

Joe C. MEIGHAN, Jr., for himself, and others similarly situated, Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

U.S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

April 29, 1996.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1996.

Donald K. Vowell, A. James Andrews, Thomas A. Snapp, Knoxville, for Appellant.

J. Anthony Farmer, Knoxville, for Amicus Curiae.

John B. Rayson, John C. Burgin, Jr., Adrienne L. Anderson, Knoxville, for Appellee.

OPINION

WHITE, Justice.

In this case we are called upon to examine the application of Rule 23, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure to actions…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API