Legal Opinion
Roosevelt Daniels, Edward Fitzgerald and Lawrence Lee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 9, 1994No. 93-2152, 93-2159 and 93-2160PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Edward Fitzgerald, Lawrence Lee, and Roosevelt Daniels appeal the denial of their motions to vacate or correct their sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, contending they were denied the effective assistance of counsel (Sixth Amendment). 1 They assert that they were unable to receive effective assistance of counsel because the government refused to allow them to participate in the development of the record dealing with the question of whether the extension (time limitation) of the special grand jury was valid. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
We summarize the procedural history to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arthur L. Belford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John R. MazakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Roosevelt DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rene Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Mark K. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Leonard J. Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Valona v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.