Legal Opinion

Barajas v. Oren Realty & Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1997No. B109343PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZEBROWSKI, J.

This case concerns statements made and information discussed during a mediation. By statute, such statements and information are neither discoverable nor admissible. (Evid. Code, § 1152.5 (section 1152.5), subd. (a)(1).) Moreover, such statements and information “shall remain confidential.” (§ 1152.5, subd. (a)(3) [“all communications, negotiations, or settlement discussions by and between participants or mediators ... in the mediation shall remain confidential.” (Italics added).].)

The case arises because plaintiffs’ attorney became involved in two related lawsuits against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Holmes v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Dino v. PELAYOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. County of Fresno v. Malaga County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Lewis C. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API