Barajas v. Oren Realty & Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZEBROWSKI, J.
This case concerns statements made and information discussed during a mediation. By statute, such statements and information are neither discoverable nor admissible. (Evid. Code, § 1152.5 (section 1152.5), subd. (a)(1).) Moreover, such statements and information “shall remain confidential.” (§ 1152.5, subd. (a)(3) [“all communications, negotiations, or settlement discussions by and between participants or mediators ... in the mediation shall remain confidential.” (Italics added).].)
The case arises because plaintiffs’ attorney became involved in two related lawsuits against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Holmes v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dino v. PELAYOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- County of Fresno v. Malaga County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lewis C. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.