United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 United States Currency Seized From Citizen's Bank Account L7N01967
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we must decide whether to recognize, nostra sponte, “plain error” 1 in the legal standards applied by the District Court in concluding that certain funds of the appellant seized by the government were the product of illegal activities and therefore subject to forfeiture.
Our review of the record leads us to conclude that, although the several claims of error asserted by the appellant are without merit, the District Court’s application of legal standards antedating adoption of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”), Pub.L. No.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Marcos Poventud v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Campuzano v. Alavi FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. StarlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- United States v. ViloskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Ligon ex rel. J.G. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.