Medina v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we consider whether an out-of-court statement made by a rape victim a day after the startling event falls within the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. Even though the statement was made a day after the rape, we conclude that the mental and physical condition of the victim, coupled with the fact that she remained under the stress of excitement caused by the rape, brings her statement within the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule.
FACTS
Appellant Albert Medina was staying with a friend in a Las Vegas apartment. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Vega v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Harkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.