Legal Opinion

J.A.M. v. United States of America

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 24, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00380Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.A.M., a minor child; O.A.M., a minor Case No.: 3:22-CV-00380-GPC-BGS child; and THELMA MEDINA 12 NAVARRO, their mother, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS Plaintiffs, 14 v. [ECF No. 71] 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re-Tax Costs. ECF No. 71. A briefing 19 schedule was set by the Court, ECF No. 72, but the United States did not oppose, and 20 Plaintiffs did not file a reply. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John Draper v. D. RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re Veritas Software Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  5. Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API