Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 13, 2024No. 30/23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Lamont Smith, No. 30, September Term, 2023, Opinion by Booth, J. ADMISSION OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE UNDER DECLARATION AGAINST PENAL INTEREST—The Supreme Court of Maryland has established a process for admitting certain types of hearsay statements that fall within a particular hearsay exception that is commonly known as the “declaration against penal interest.” State v. Matusky,

343 Md. 467

(1996). Under that process, when a proponent seeks to admit presumptively inadmissible hearsay statements that comprise an extended narrative or interview, a trial court must conduct a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  2. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API