Legal Opinion
Robert D. Freeman v. State of Idaho
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1991No. 90-35511Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
952 F.2d 406
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Robert D. FREEMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Appellee.
No. 90-35511.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 8, 1991.*
Decided Dec. 17, 1991.
Before KILKENNY, SNEED and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Freeman appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Jean L. Richards v. Hal Harper, Max Baucus, and Pat WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Oen Yin-Choy v. Glen S. Robinson, U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Hughes Anderson BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bianchi v. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991