Thal v. Polumbaum
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Isidor Wasservogel,
Official Eeferee. Plaintiffs’ complaint sets forth six causes of action whereby they seek an injunction, an accounting, and damages based upon the defendants’ unfair *899competitive practices and their conspiracy to convert and destroy plaintiffs’ business and property rights.
Early ,in 1946, the plaintiff corporations, Lu-Bee Products Corporation, Sellevision Corporation, and Litewriter Corporation were engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, and distributing an imprint illuminated sign which was made under patent rights owned by the plaintiff Lu-Bee Products…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
- Conviser v. J. C. Brownstone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Extrin Foods, Inc. v. LeightonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Head & Engquist Equipment, L.L.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
- Thal v. PolumbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950