Hicox v. Graham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, County of Santa Clara. There is but one point in the case, which is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Terry.
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
Respondent, as administrator of Henry Nail, instituted an action ,, against appellant, in the District Court for Santa Clara County. On motion of plaintiff a non-suit was entered, and judgment rendered in favor of defendant for costs. Afterwards, on motion of plaintiff, said judgment was amended by adding, that the judgment should be made out of the estate of the said Henry Nail, in the hands of said administrator, From this order defendant appeals.
The 144th section of the Act to regulate settlement…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Elias v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Seaton v. SonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Meyer v. O'RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McCarthy v. SpeedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.