Legal Opinion

Bixby v. Sinclair Refining Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1946No. 31357PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A tenant who continues to use a building which is dangerously out of repair, when this dangerous condition is patent and known to him, can not recover for damages resulting from this dangerous condition. This is true notwithstanding the fact that the landlord or owner of the premises has had notice of and has inspected the dangerous condition of the premises and has negligently failed to repair them. This is true, for knowing the dangerous condition of the premises and the negligence of the landlord in not repairing them, it will be held that the tenant failed to exercise ordinary care for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stack v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Ball v. WalshSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Donehoe v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Aikin v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Palmour Court ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Banks v. Housing C. of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Hearn v. BardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Thompson v. CrownoverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Howell Gas of Athens, Inc. v. CoileCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API