Legal Opinion
Allen v. Sakai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1994No. 93-16780PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REJECTING EN BANC SUGGESTION
The opinion filed November 15, 1994 [40 F.3d 1001] is amended as follows:
Slip op. at 13860 [p. 1004]: Insert before first full paragraph (The last sentence of insert is first sentence of first full paragraph):
An Eighth Amendment claim that a prison official has deprived inmates of humane conditions of confinement must meet two requirements, one objective and one subjective. Farmer v. Brennan, — U.S. -, -, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 1977, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). Under the objective *1084requirement, the prison official’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- David N. OSOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lt. KANE, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Dennis Anderson v. Gilberto Romero and Arthur DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lecia Shorter v. Leroy BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Allen v. SakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.