Legal Opinion
In Re Sorrell
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 26, 2007No. 06-31720PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION DENYING MOTION OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE TO DISMISS CHAPTER 7 CASE PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(2) AND/OR (b)(3)
THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.
Background
On July 3, 2006, the Debtors, Mark and Michelle Sorrell, filed a chapter 7 petition (Doc. 1). This chapter 7 case is subject to the provisions of Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (the “2005 Act”), more specifically, this case requires consideration of issues presented by 11 U.S.C. § 707(b), commonly referred to as the means test. The court further notes that this case is…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re HeneburyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2007
- In Re KolbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- In Re HaarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- In Re HamanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- In Re WatsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.