Legal Opinion

Savannah River Lumber Co. v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1924No. 14717, 14718Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where timber is sold at a certain price upon the stump, the purchaser, after having cut it, is bound under the contract to pay for it although he left it upon the premises of the seller.

2. Where the seller afterwards, in ignorance of the identity of the timber, purchases it from another, to whom the original purchaser has abandoned *705it, the original purchaser is not thereby relieved of his obligation to pay the seller for it. See, in this connection, Tharp v. Anderson, 31 Ga. 293; Spiers v. Hubbard, 12 Ga. App. 276 (78 S. E. 136).

Decided February 28, 1924. Thomas & Wallcer, for plaintiff in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spiers v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Tharp v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API