Legal Opinion

Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. State Board of Assessors

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion to order the prosecutor' to pay the state tax, as a? condition of further prosecuting -the writ of certiorari to review the tax. Argued November Term, 1891, before Justices- Dixon, Reed and Garrison.

1Opinion of the Court

*91The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

A tax having been levied upon the prosecutor under “An act for the imposition of state taxes upon certain corporations and for the collection thereof,” approved April 18th, 1884 (Rev. Sup.,p. 1016), and its supplements, a writ of certiorari was heretofore allowed by one of the justices of this court to review' said tax, on condition that the prosecutor pay said tax pending the' writ, if the Supreme Court, at this term,' should so order. The attorney general now moves for such an order.

The question, raised by the prosecutor involves the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Arimex Consolidated Copper Co. v. State Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Binder Realty Corp. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  4. Presbyterian Church v. Plainfield TrustNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API