Legal Opinion
Rahimzadeh v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2010No. 08-73985PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Changiz Rahimzadeh (Rahimzadeh) testified that he was persecuted first in Iran by the government on account of his political activity and later in the Netherlands by Muslim extremists on account of his conversion to Christianity. The Immigration Judge (IJ) deemed Rahimzadeh’s testimony credible and granted withholding of removal to Iran, but denied asylum from, and withholding of removal to, the Netherlands. The IJ concluded that Rahimzadeh had not suffered past persecution in the Netherlands and that his fear of future persecution was not objectively reasonable,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marjorie Konda Lolong v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Maya Avetova-Elisseva v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Abrahim Baballah Ula Baballah Ahmad Baballah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Andriasian v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Carlos Bringas-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Afriyie v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Castro-Martinez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.