J.D. v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GUIDUGLI, JUDGE.
This juvenile matter is before the Court on discretionary review so that we may determine whether J.D.’s rights under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. *611709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), were violated when he admitted guilt to two charges. J.D. argues that the district court did not subject him to a Boykin colloquy when he decided to enter his plea. On the other hand, the Commonwealth argues that J.D.’s rights were protected in that the district court notified him of his constitutional rights, including those conferred by Boykin, during an earlier court appearance.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- D.R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Marie Anne Laswell v. Richard Frey, Jailer, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.C. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- B.H. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- N.K. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- M.A.M. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
- BH v. Com.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.