Legal Opinion

Florida Progress Corp. v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided December 2, 1999No. 93-246-CIV-T-25APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ADAMS, District Judge.

Before this Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.32) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability (Dkt.36). This action is primarily an action for refund of federal income taxes paid by Plaintiff for the years 1982 through 1985. Additionally, Defendant seeks to reopen Plaintiffs tax returns for the years 1976 through 1981 to assess further federal income taxes. This Court, having considered the facts and the arguments of counsel and being otherwise fully advised, hereby grants in part (as to the years 1982 through 1985), and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Commissioner v. SchleierSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florida Progress Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API