Legal Opinion

Owens v. DRS Automotive Fantomworks, Inc.

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Decided June 10, 2013No. Case No. (Civil) CL 12-7354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Charles E. Poston

This action is before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ demurrer to the Defendants’ amended counterclaim. Having considered the written submissions filed by both parties, the Court will sustain the demurrer.

Introduction

An action for defamation is subject to a heightened pleading requirement under which the claim must be based on assertions of fact rather than opinion. See, e.g., Fuste v. Riverside Healthcare Ass’n, 265 Va. 127, 575 S.E.2d 858 (2003). The plaintiff’s pleading must include the exact defamatory words or phrases used by the defendant in order to provide an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuste v. Riverside Healthcare Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Kollman v. JordanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Federal Land Bank v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Long v. Old Point BankNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1997
  5. Jarrett v. GoldmanPortsmouth County Circuit Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doctor's Data, Inc. v. BarrettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Virginia Prosthetics, Inc. v. FullerCharlottesville County Circuit Court · 2015
  3. Grover Gaming, Inc. v. HuffmanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
  4. Grover Gaming, Inc. v. RiceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API