Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Casavant

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 5, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer against a disseizor who has not acquired any claim by possession and improvement. R. S., Chap. 99, Sec. 1. The action was begun in the Lewiston Municipal Court. Plea, not guilty, with brief statement of title. The case was removed to the Superior Court in Androscoggin county, R. S., Chap. 99, Sec. 6; Laws of 1929, Chap. 141.

In the Superior Court, plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant saved an exception.

A devisee of real estate for life with power of disposal, in disregard of testamentary condition that, on exercising the power, certain persons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Groustra v. BourgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  2. Rancourt v. NicholsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  3. Roberts v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  4. Sweeney v. DahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API