Legal Opinion

Haas v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2006No. 15S01-0606-CR-231PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 15A01-0405-CR-212

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Nathan Haas challenges his twenty-year sentence for conspiracy to commit burglary, imposed following a guilty plea. He says it violates his Sixth Amendment rights as outlined in Blakely v. Washington. A sufficient number of the aggravating circumstances require proof to a jury that we are unable to say with confidence that the sentence is an appropriate one. We remand with directions to afford the State a chance to prove those aggravators, or for imposition of a sentence of twelve…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ryle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Trusley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. McDonald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Rowe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Green v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Baysinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API