Legal Opinion

Reimann v. United States

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided July 21, 1961No. 2237PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Henry P. Reimann and Eunice W. Reimann, husband and wife, own and operate a farm in Fremont County, State of Idaho, as their community property. In the fall of 1958, plaintiff Henry F. Reimann applied for and obtained a soil bank conservation reserve contract with the United States, covering all of the farm’s eligible acreage. Under the terms of the contract, plaintiffs would have been entitled to a total payment of $5,951.20 for the year 1959 had they complied with the conditions stated therein. Prior to the negotiations for the contract, plaintiffs planted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas J. Maxwell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Fargo v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gaskill v. JacobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Abbl v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. White v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glen H. Shay Et Ux. v. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation State Committee for ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Wood v. DeWeeseDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1969
  3. Countryside Developers, Inc. v. PetersonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. United States v. McConkeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Thomas v. DudreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API