Legal Opinion

Countryside Developers, Inc. v. Peterson

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2000No. A-00-046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Michael and Nancy Peterson (Petersons) own a lot in Countryside Acres Addition in Elm Creek, Nebraska, and the lots therein are restricted by covenants, which, inter alia, provide that no building shall be erected on any lot other than one detached single-family dwelling and a private garage for not more than two cars. Petersons were constructing two outbuildings on their lot, and Countryside Development, Inc. (Countryside), filed this action for a declaration that the covenants prevented Petersons’ construction. The covenants provide that a majority of the lot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Landon v. PettijohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Chapman v. KimballNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Keller v. BonesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Omega Chemical Co., Inc. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adair Holdings v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Breci v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API