Koch v. Gorruflo
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Howell, V. C.
This suit is brought for the purpose of enforcing a covenant restrictive of the use of lands. The Mutual Land and Improvement Company owned the lands on both sides of a street in Newark called Hedden Terrace, the whole of which they have now sold. The complainant and defendant, respectively, own parcels of this land. They derived their titles through different intermediary grantees so that there is no privity of estate between them. The covenant is sought to be enforced by virtue of what Yice-Chancellor Green called the right of amenity, in the case of De Grey v. Monmouth Beach…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gannett v. AlbreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Levy v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Lignot v. JaekleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. LambertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Hines v. HeislerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Walker v. HaslettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Fox v. Sumerson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.