Legal Opinion

Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Linnenkohl

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2013No. A12A1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Douglas Asphalt Company appeals after the trial court granted summary judgment to Harold Linnenkohl based on OCGA § 50-21-25 (a) which grants immunity to State employees for acts within the scope of their employment. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

The record shows that the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) hired Douglas Asphalt to do asphalt paving work on certain highways in the state. It was determined in testing done by Applied Technical Services (ATS) that there were lime deficiencies in *428the asphalt on portions of the 1-95 and 1-75 projects worked on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Qore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Exxon Corp. v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Georgia Department of Transportation v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northside Hospital Inc. v. E. Kendrick SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Douglas Coe v. Proskauer, LLP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API