Kirstein v. Kirstein
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
It is an accepted law in North Carolina that courts of one state cannot determine title to real property located in another state. Lea v. Dudley, 20 N.C. App. 702, 202 S.E. 2d 799 (1974); No ble v. Pittman, 241 N.C. 601, 86 S.E. 2d 89 (1955); McRary v. McRary, 228 N.C. 714, 47 S.E. 2d 27 (1948). The Kentucky court had no power to determine title to the realty in dispute, which was located in North Carolina.
Plaintiff does not attack the validity of the Kentucky divorce decree. Even if the Kentucky court had jurisdiction over the parties, it does not follow as a corollary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- York v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Freeze Ex Rel. Freeze v. CongletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Courtney v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Cole v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Buchanan v. WeberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- N Re Skybridge Terrace, LLC Litig.North Carolina Business Court · 2015