Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Marx

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1917No. S. F. No. 7623PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County admitting a will to probate. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The record presents an appeal by Stephanie Henke, a niece of the decedent, and her only heir at law, from an order admitting to probate, as constituting together the last will of the decedent, two documents testamentary in character, executed at different dates.

The decedent died on May 14, 1914. One of the documents in question was dated March 8, 1910, the other March 26, 1913. The latter was found immediately after her death and, on petition of the persons named therein as executors, was duly admitted to probate on June 8, 1914. Several months after their appointment as executors, upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Austin v. . OakesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Altrock v. VandenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Moore v. McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Martin v. McMullanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Wollesen v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API