Legal Opinion

West Durham Lumber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1971No. 7114SC530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

We think, as did the trial judge and the attorneys, that the differences between the two general contracts and the two general contractor’s bonds are differences without distinction as to the legal obligation of the defendant surety to pay claims by subcontractors, laborers, or materialmen against the general contractor. Nevertheless, the wording is somewhat different and we will set out the pertinent portions in order that the facts to which this opinion applies will be clear.

In the Chapel Hill contract the general contractor agrees: “The Contractor shall furnish all work,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Hipwell v. the National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Ideal Brick Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Dixon v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of North Carolina v. Odell Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Lake View Trust & Savings Bank v. Filmore Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API