United States v. Miklos Varga, Hans Christian Elley, Richard Theodore Jantos and Peter Armbruster. Miklos Varga
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Miklos Varga appeals from his conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. His contentions are bottomed on alleged violations of the Sixth Amendment: first, the ten-month delay between indictment and trial violated his right to a speedy trial; second, he had ineffective assistance of counsel.
Four factors are considered when deciding whether a violation of the right to a speedy trial has occurred: “The length of the delay; the reason for the delay; the prejudice to the defendant; and waiver by the defendant.” United States v. Taddeo, 434 F.2d 228, 229 (2d…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Albert TaddeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
4Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Russell HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States Ex Rel. Freddie M. Johnson v. Robert L. Johnson, Superintendent, Appeal of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert D. GolubCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.